27–29 May 2024
Geneva
Europe/Zurich timezone

Global health governance performance during Covid-19, what needs to be changed? a delphi survey study

Not scheduled
15m
Geneva

Geneva

Oral presentation Migration, health and equity

Description

Background Covid-19 is not the first pandemic to challenge GHG. Preceding outbreaks and epidemics were sources
of continuous debate on GHG leadership and structure resulting in its current structure. However, Covid-19 proved
the presence of many deficits in the current GHG. The response to the Covid-19 pandemic is a cumulative result of
all policies and actions of different governments and agencies active in global health. Assessing how Covid-19 is
being handled globally provides lessons for ensuring better performance in facing upcoming outbreaks. This study
has three main objectives: first, to evaluate the performance of GHG during Covid-19 in general and in relation to
Covid-19 vaccine equity in particular. Second, to identify the reasons behind this performance; and third, to propose
prospective changes in GHG for better performance.
Methods A cross-sectional research design using the Delphi method was applied. A panel of experts participated in
the three-round Delphi surveys. Their scores were used to perform consensus, performance and correlation analysis.
Results GHG performance limited the achievement of Covid-19 vaccines’ global equity. GHG performance is
a product of the existing GHG system, its actors and legal framework. It is a collective result of individual GHG
actors’ performance. The most influential actors in decision-making regarding Covid-19 vaccine are the vaccine
manufacturers and governments. While the most invoked power to influence decision are economic and political
powers. Covid-19 decisions underlying value, although had human right to health at the base, overlooked the
concept of health as a global public good and was skewed towards market-oriented values. GHG mal-performance
along with its underlying factors calls for four main changes in GHG structure: assigning a clear steward for GHG,
enhanced accountability, centralized authority, more equitable representation of actors, and better legal framework.
Conclusion GHG structure, actors’ representation, accountability system, and underlying priorities and value require
future modification for GHG to achieve better future performance and higher health equity levels.

Contact Geneva Health Forum I would like to receive information about the GHF 2024 conference and other GHF activities / Je souhaite recevoir des informations sur la conférence GHF 2024 et d'autres activités du GHF.

Author

Wafa Abu El Kheir-Mataria (The American University in Cairo)

Co-authors

Prof. Hassan El Fawal (The American University in Cairo) Prof. Sungsoo Chun (The American University in Cairo)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.